Mansford Estate Forums

All Categories > Public > Block Upgrade Issues > Security proposals for Charles Dickens House

Total Posts: 1 - Pages (1): [1]

Author: richard reynolds
Posted: 03 Jan 2005 - 12:56 PM
Subject: Security proposals for Charles Dickens House

The information regarding works to take place on Charles Dickens House are dissapointing.
Although security is mentioned as a top priority, the propsals by the architects only talk of superficial improvements to the surrounding area and do not address the main concerns of tenants and leaseholders.
Charles Dickens House is in desparate need of effective measures to improve security.
The security measures needed should be substantialy better than a glazed entrance to the lifts.
The anti-social behaviour that goes on, around and within the block needs to be tackled with much more concrete measures. Concierge services or double gating are the only way to improve the situation.
Non-tenants who get into the block and who vandalise the interior, drug take and deal drugs in the stair well, cause noise and nuisance on the landings will not be detered by a glazed entrance.
This also includes the lift that is constantly in a disgusting state and used as a toilet and a bin.
The views aired at the consultation meetings do not seem to have been taken into account, the future for Charles Dickens House must be security based and then the visual look of the area must come second to this.

Total Posts: 1 - Pages (1): [1]

Click here for a complete list of threads

You must login to post a message to this conference.

(copy 1)

Click here to register/log in

Learn How to Contribute to Forums Here

Uee these forums to make public your concerns, comments, and contributions on any of the issues surrounding Housing Choice, and to comment on the contributions of others. Please be aware that your contributions will be visible to anyone who visits the website.

Before you can post your own contributions, you need to have registered with the site, and then log on.

Use of the forums is subject to terms of use - basically, you are welcome to make relevant contributions, but you should not make osbcene, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable comments. If you do, we may withdraw your membership, and we will certainly delete your postings.

We reserve the right to remove any posting for any reason, though we will not in practice do so unless they contravene the principles above.

Be aware also that we cannot check all entries immediately. If you have any objection to any posting, contact us, and we will take appropriate action.

Edit your profile if you wish to be emailed automatically whenever anyone posts to one or more groups.

If you wish to contact a member privately, you can do so either through the members list, or here.



		Home Site Map Search Glossary Contact Us
	Mansford Estate Forums Search watch thread All Categories > Public > Block Upgrade Issues > Security proposals for Charles Dickens House Total Posts: 1 - Pages (1): [1] Author: richard reynolds Posted: 03 Jan 2005 - 12:56 PM Subject: Security proposals for Charles Dickens House The information regarding works to take place on Charles Dickens House are dissapointing. Although security is mentioned as a top priority, the propsals by the architects only talk of superficial improvements to the surrounding area and do not address the main concerns of tenants and leaseholders. Charles Dickens House is in desparate need of effective measures to improve security. The security measures needed should be substantialy better than a glazed entrance to the lifts. The anti-social behaviour that goes on, around and within the block needs to be tackled with much more concrete measures. Concierge services or double gating are the only way to improve the situation. Non-tenants who get into the block and who vandalise the interior, drug take and deal drugs in the stair well, cause noise and nuisance on the landings will not be detered by a glazed entrance. This also includes the lift that is constantly in a disgusting state and used as a toilet and a bin. The views aired at the consultation meetings do not seem to have been taken into account, the future for Charles Dickens House must be security based and then the visual look of the area must come second to this. Total Posts: 1 - Pages (1): [1] Click here for a complete list of threads You must login to post a message to this conference. (copy 1) Click here to register/log in Learn How to Contribute to Forums Here Uee these forums to make public your concerns, comments, and contributions on any of the issues surrounding Housing Choice, and to comment on the contributions of others. Please be aware that your contributions will be visible to anyone who visits the website. Before you can post your own contributions, you need to have registered with the site, and then log on. Use of the forums is subject to terms of use - basically, you are welcome to make relevant contributions, but you should not make osbcene, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable comments. If you do, we may withdraw your membership, and we will certainly delete your postings. We reserve the right to remove any posting for any reason, though we will not in practice do so unless they contravene the principles above. Be aware also that we cannot check all entries immediately. If you have any objection to any posting, contact us, and we will take appropriate action. Edit your profile if you wish to be emailed automatically whenever anyone posts to one or more groups. If you wish to contact a member privately, you can do so either through the members list, or here.


Copyright Disclaimer